Master of Architecture CDE Design Studio

Assignment Review / Mid-Semester Review / Final Review

Studio Leader:

Date:

Student Name:

Student ID:

Reviewers:

Level: C / D / E

w | Studio Learning Outcomes | M +/_ | S +/_ | U +/_ | NSCA Performance Criteria
Studio XX: Studio Name

Comments:

M : [MERIT] You are excelling in the area identified. The work is very high quality and you have gone above and beyond the minimum requirement. Your conception is excellent as your execution. You are pushing yourself hard, and it shows in the project. You are a leader in the studio both in behaviour and by the example of your work or performance in this area.
S : [SATISFACTORY] You have met the minimum required deliverables and are actively working to produce excellent work, in both conception and execution. You are working diligently to improve and participate.
U : [UNSATISFACTORY] Your work may be incomplete and/or of unsatisfactory quality for the studio. Your input and contribution to the studio are insufficient.

Indicative Overall Grade

Research, context & critcal reflection

Concept design

Design development

Detailed resolution & refinement

Other