Peer Supported Ghost Writing
Ghost writing is a form of ‘contract cheating’ that involves students asking for, or accepting an invitation for, someone else to produce work that is submitted for assessment, as their own work. A ghost writer may be a student’s peer who offers work they have already completed.
Jerome is tempted to buy an assignment off another student who completed the same subject during a previous semester.
How can I detect peer supported ghost writing?
In the past, staff have suspected peer supported ghost writing in assignments that:
- Significantly exceeds the standard of work previously submitted.
- Turnitin reports high or very low percentage of similarity with other sources. (The ‘classic plagiarism’ page explains why this signals academic misconduct).
- Significantly exceeds staff expectations of the cohort’s skill and experience.
- Couldn’t reasonably be completed within the time-frame
- Is submitted quickly after an extension is requested and / or requested.
- Answer the question with examples provided in previous semesters.
- References websites that are either no longer available, or access dates that are older than three months.
- Has missing sections, in particular the requirement for self-reflection on the task
- Inconsistent language, tone and / or grammar in different parts of the task.
What steps should I take?
- If you are a Tutor, advise the Senior Tutor or Subject Coordinator of your suspicions about the authenticity of a submission.
- Collect evidence of the suspected misconduct, without accusing the student of engaging in misconduct. This should include:
- A copy of the student’s submission that highlights the suspicious content, and
- Other examples of the student’s work to set a ‘benchmark standard’ and / or
- Notes from a meeting with the student where they were asked to explain the formation of ideas and/or conclusions.
- The Senior Tutor or Subject Coordinator should contact ABP Academic Service Office, with evidence, for advice on next steps.