Studio Teaching within the Faculty

Studios are a core component of learning and teaching within the Faculty, across various disciplines.

Postgraduate studios can sometimes operate quite autonomously and independently and, studio leaders are often required to operate with minimal interactions with the subject coordinators. As such it is important that studio leaders understand their responsibilities and that university and faculty policies and regulation are still observed.

  • Preparing your Studio

    The following link contains information about getting your studio ready at the start of the semester.

    MSD Studio (requires login).

  • ABP / MSD Studio Culture Agreement

    The Studio Culture Agreement has been developed by undergraduate and postgraduate students in the Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning at the University of Melbourne, in consultation with academic staff, through the ABP Student Forum.

    Design studios are an essential element of the broad learning culture in the Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, and the Melbourne School of Design, and the extended design community. The studio environment provides a space for collaboration, experimentation and development that is integral to the study and practice of design. The Studio Culture Agreement delivers common goals and expectations to foster a positive and productive learning environment for students, tutors and the faculty. This  agreement requires the commitment of the faculty, tutors and students.

    The Studio Culture Agreement can be found here.

  • National Standard of Competency for Architects (NSCA) Studio Resources

    In preparation for the upcoming Architects Accreditation Council of Australia (AACA) visit, the MSD will collect evidence of mapping of the Performance Criteria in studio teaching and assessment, and examples of student work and feedback.  All confirmed National Standard of Competency for Architects (NSCA) studios (which will have a mix of CDE students, but will be the only studios available to C students) will need to confirm that all of the Performance Criteria are addressed and assessed.  These criteria may be weighted differently in importance, and interpreted differently, depending on the focus of the particular studio. Other MArch studios (available to D and E students) will be mapping where these performance criteria are taught and assessed across the program, and MSD will be collecting this evidence also.

    The Resources for the NSCA Studio Workshops will help to collect required evidence for the AACA visit:

    Re Evidence collection pre-semester

    1. when the Performance Criteria are taught eg mapping studio teaching activities (see link);

    2. when the Performance Criteria are assessed eg mapping assessment activities (see link);

    3. how Performance Criteria are assessed eg mapping on a template / rubric (this may exist, or be developed).

    For #3, you might choose to annotate a current rubric to indicate how it will assess these criteria alongside other studio-specific criteria.

    Please contact the studio subject coordinator (Prof Donald Bates), or senior tutor (Kristen Wang) for more details of the timeline etc.

    A BEL+T ‘Rubric Whisperer’ can help with development or refinement of a rubric alongside this mapping: please contact us via: abp-belt@unimelb.edu.au

    Re Evidence collection during/end semester

    Please be aware MSD will also collect examples for this accreditation process during or at the end of the semester as below (further information will be provided):

    4. breakdown of student results per assessment task indicating the mark and its weighting

    5. samples of student work including both digital and physical work: 2 x threshold, 2 x medium, 2x high (more details to follow)

    6. marked rubric and formal written feedback to students per assessment task

  • Design Crits

    Crits are a key form of assessment in the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning. They can be a valuable tool to enhance student learning, and the development of design skills and practices. When they work well they can be a rich collaborative learning discussion, but they can also be a cause of frustration and tension.  The following links outline some key issues to consider, calls for creative application of the format, and ways crits can offer valuable learning.

    https://www.architecturefoundation.org.uk/writing/crit-critique

    https://www.archdaily.com/896273/how-can-we-fix-the-architecture-crit-first-ask-for-evidence

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/jebe.2011.06010044

    Studio leaders are advised to use their allocated room for mid semester review. Room allocation for final reviews will be arranged by Geoff Kelly.

  • List of MSD Studios

    Below is a link to the list of Master Studios offered at MSD. The list includes:

    • Master of Urban Planning Capstone
    • Master of Urban Design Studios
    • Master of Landscape Architecture Studios
    • Master of Architecture A/B
    • Master of Architecture Studio CDE
    • Master of Architecture Design Thesis
    • MSD Travelling Studios

    MSD Studios

    Traveling Studios