Dahmen, J., Kayaalp, M. E., Ollivier, M., Pareek, A., Hirschmann, M. T., Karlsson, J., & Winkler, P. W.(2023). Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: The potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of theESSKA.
Gimpel, H., Hall, K., Decker, S., Eymann, T., Lämmermann, L., Mädche, A., ... & Vandrik, S. (2023). Unlocking the power of generative AI models and systems such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT for higher education: A guide for students and lecturers (No. 02-2023). Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Ferrara, E. (2023). Should ChatGPT be biased? challenges and risks of bias in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03738.
Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02819.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems.
Creativty and IP Rights
Appel, G., Neelbauer, J., & Schweidel, D. A. (2023, 16 June 2023). Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem. Intellectual Property. https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem
Arielli, E., & Manovich, L. (2022). AI-aesthetics and the Anthropocentric Myth of Creativity. NODES, 1(19-20).
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1994). Design Expertise Amongst Student Designers. Journal of Art and Design Education, 13(1), 39-56.
Miernicki, M., & Ng, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and moral rights. AI & SOCIETY, 36(1), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01027-6
Natale, S., & Henrickson, L. The Lovelace effect: Perceptions of creativity in machines. New Media & Society, 0(0), 14614448221077278. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221077278
Shtefan, A. (2021). Creativity and artificial intelligence: a view from the perspective of copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(7), 720-728. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab093
Wingström, R., Hautala, J., & Lundman, R. (2022). Redefining Creativity in the Era of AI? Perspectives of Computer Scientists and New Media Artists. Creativity Research Journal, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850
GenAI and Assessment Design
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M.,Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1229-1245.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In M. Bearman, P. Dawson, R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, & D. Boud (Eds.), Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World (pp. 37-48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4