Inclusive Assessment Adjustments Table
| Action | Rationale | Benefits and Advice |
|---|---|---|
| Explicitly align assessments with course objectives | Empirical Evidence: Ensures assessments measure intended outcomes (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Clarify vocabulary and symbols" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 2). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students focus on learning objectives. | Benefit to students: Ensures understanding of learning objectives.
|
| Provide flexible assessment procedures and methods | Empirical Evidence: Allows accommodations for diverse needs (Leeds Beckett University, 2018). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide multiple means of action and expression" (UDL Principle II, Guideline 4). Disability and Neurodiversity: Supports diverse learning needs. | Benefit to students: Ensures fairness and inclusivity in assessments.
|
| Provide a variety of assessment submission types | Empirical Evidence: Reduces reliance on high-stakes testing (Carnegie Mellon University, n.d.). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide multiple means of engagement" (UDL Principle III, Guideline 7). Disability and Neurodiversity: Supports diverse learning abilities. | Benefit to students: Supports diverse learners and reduces stress.
|
| Evaluate learning outcomes, not access skills | Empirical Evidence: Focus on learning outcomes (Carnegie Mellon University, n.d.). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for perception" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 1). Disability and Neurodiversity: Ensures fair assessment of knowledge and skills. | Benefit to students: Provides fair assessment process.
|
| Provide flexible extensions | Empirical Evidence: Addresses challenges faced by students with disabilities (Gibson & Leinster, 2011). DSE 2005: Part 3, Section 3.3. DDA 1992: Section 5. UDL: "Optimise individual choice and autonomy" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 7.1). Disability and Neurodiversity: Accommodates varying processing speeds and health conditions. | Benefit to students: Ensures equitable access and additional time.
|
| Changed Exam Conditions | Empirical Evidence: Improved performance under adjusted conditions (Johnson et al., 2018). DSE 2005: Part 5, Section 5.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Minimise threats and distractions" (UDL Principle III, Guideline 7.3). Disability and Neurodiversity: Supports diverse needs such as anxiety and sensory processing issues. | Benefit to students: Inclusive environment for optimal performance.
|
| Provide options for different formats of assessments submission | Empirical Evidence: Supports diverse strengths (Bunbury, 2020). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for expression and communication" (UDL Principle II, Guideline 5). Disability and Neurodiversity: Supports preferences like oral vs. written submissions. | Benefit to students: Measures understanding and skills, not format.
|
| Ensure smaller assignments | Empirical Evidence: Reduces anxiety and manages workload (Ramsden, 2003). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for sustaining effort and persistence" (UDL Principle III, Guideline 8). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students with attention and executive functioning challenges. | Benefit to students: Supports incremental learning and effective workload management.
|
| Meaningful formative assessments | Empirical Evidence: Ongoing feedback supports improvement (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for self-regulation" (UDL Principle III, Guideline 9). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students with learning disabilities improve incrementally. | Benefit to students: Enhances learning through continuous feedback.
|
| Assignments that follow course structure | Empirical Evidence: Reinforces learning and supports retention (Biggs & Tang, 2011). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for comprehension" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 3). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students with organisational challenges and those benefiting from routine. | Benefit to students: Enhances coherence and continuity in learning.
|
| Clear and coherent criteria and pointers | Empirical Evidence: Reduces ambiguity and clarifies expectations (O’Donovan et al., 2008). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for executive functions" (UDL Principle II, Guideline 6). Disability and Neurodiversity: Reduces anxiety by clarifying requirements. | Benefit to students: Provides transparency and helps students understand expectations.
|
| Detailed and timely feedback | Empirical Evidence: Critical for improvement and learning (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for self-regulation" (UDL Principle III, Guideline 9). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students with disabilities understand performance and improvement areas. | Benefit to students: Encourages continuous improvement and supports learning.
|
| Leniency on spelling/grammar | Empirical Evidence: Focus on content quality (Graham & Perin, 2007). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for expression and communication" (UDL Principle II, Guideline 5). Disability and Neurodiversity: Benefits students with language-based learning disabilities. | Benefit to students: Ensures assessments measure content knowledge rather than mechanics.
|
| Use of assistive technology | Empirical Evidence: Improves accessibility and performance (Dell et al., 2017). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Optimise access to tools and assistive technologies" (UDL Principle II, Guideline 4.2). Disability and Neurodiversity: Tools like screen readers and speech-to-text help students with disabilities. | Benefit to students: Enhances accessibility and demonstration of knowledge.
|
| Captions/transcripts for videos | Empirical Evidence: Improves accessibility for hearing impairments (Burgstahler, 2020). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for perception" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 1). Disability and Neurodiversity: Helps students with hearing impairments and those who process information better through reading. | Benefit to students: Ensures all students can access video content and fully participate.
|
| Individual Consultation with Teacher | Empirical Evidence: Personalised support enhances understanding and performance (Carless, 2015). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Optimise individual choice and autonomy" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 7.1). Disability and Neurodiversity: Beneficial for students needing additional help understanding material or requirements. | Benefit to students: Provides targeted support and addresses specific challenges.
|
| Access to Rubric and Exemplars | Empirical Evidence: Helps understand expectations and standards (Sadler, 1989). DSE 2005: Part 6, Section 6.2. DDA 1992: Section 22. UDL: "Provide options for comprehension" (UDL Principle I, Guideline 3). Disability and Neurodiversity: Reduces anxiety and clarifies requirements for success. | Benefit to students: Helps understand assessment standards and improve quality of work.
|